Examinations at HCT have both positive and negative aspects. The examination is an international way to give students the mark and the way to know how they learned in the course. In this essay, will look at whether examinations are an unfair way as used in HCT and discuss both sides of the arguments.
First of all, let us look at why the examinations are unfair. Many students believe that showing law marks causes nerves and they don’t fulfill the purpose of student because they feel unwell. A second point that it’s not fair way to graded the student. Some of them have a skill out of the class maybe in workshop or in the laboratory. A last point is some exams are poorly written and are culturally biased against non-western student. For example some written by western teachers. For western audiences are biased and non-western will get lower marks due to this point.
Now let’s look at why examinations are fair. Examination is fair because all of students take the same material, exam and are assessed equally. Another point, the tasting is a good way to determine what students have learned in the course. A last point is this will encourage students to work hard and will give them a good feedback in on their Knowledge about the subject.
In conclusion. I think examinations are a good way to grade the student. However the decision whether to have an exam or not should be from administration.
Mohammed Abdulla
247 words.
No comments:
Post a Comment